- A+
2021年海淀高三二模英语分析
东城区要点演示校 刘凯教师
1、试卷全体分析
这次高三英语二模操练，简略归纳为：一“旧”，两“新”。
一“旧”：即指试题难度全体与早年相等，没有太大差异，契合迩来几年高考出题难度的总趋势。
两“新”：第一“新”，即指试题题型有所改变，删掉了正本的单项选择，添加了“语法填空”这一新题型，这也是这次二模操练与早年最大的不一样；第二“新”是指，本次操练试题更赋有年代气味，特别是阅览了解、书面表达，紧紧环绕高考考试阐明的出题方向。
题型分析：
语法填空：共有三个文段，每个文段含3-4个空格，共10个空格，查询动词时态、语态，非谓语动词，定语从句，名词从句，名词，描述词，介词等语法。作为新题型，本次操练连续了“新题型不难”这一规则，甚至可以说非常简略。
第二有些：阅览了解（共两节，40分）
第一节（共15小题；每小题2分，共30分）阅览下列短文，从每题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中，选出最佳选项，并在答题卡大将该项涂黑。
阅览了解：
本次操练阅览了解全体不难，不管是常规阅览的?钠允呛蟊叩钠哐∥逶睦溃墒堑ジ霰晏獾姆橙畔钊允切枰感姆治觥⑶忠环４送猓韵铝降阈枰粜模?/p>
1、标题类型：没有呈现“标题类”、“华章规划类”主旨粗心题，推理类标题显着增多，对学生的信息了解、获取以及归纳才能的查询有所添加。
2、文章难度：全体不大，仅有单个长难句考生简略发生困惑。
3、选项难度：“文章不难选项难”，这是海淀一模的一贯特征。本次操练亦不破例，有些选项区别度小，极具诈骗性。
A
Everyone at Pacsafe is always eager to get out in the world and enjoy new cultures, food, and experiences. With that inmind we asked a few of our top travel bugs for their best travel destination recommendations for 2021. They also included their favorite Pacsafe bag to take on the trip. Enjoy and hopefully get some ideas for your own globe-trotting adventure.
Pacsafe的每自个都盼望到外面的世界去，享受新的文明、食物和领会。思考到这一点，咱们问询了一些最抢手的旅行意图地，请它们给出2021年最佳旅行意图地的主张。他们还带上了他们最喜爱的平安包。享受你的举世旅行，并期望得到一些主意。
Sri Lanka---Alison Hanko, Global Marketing Director
I’m going to Sri Lanka this summer holiday and can’t wait. It’s close to Hong Kong where I live and I’ve always wanted to go. The food is supposed to be amazing. It seems really relaxing and I really want to do the Kandy to Badulla train ride, which looks just stunning. We’ve booked a good mix of beaches, some time in a safari tent to hopefully see elephants in the wild.
For my bag, I’ll most likely take the Quiksilver 40L Pack because it has the built-in wet pack for my bikinis. It’s also a great size for a week-long trip in a warm climate.
斯里兰卡——Alison Hanko，全球商场总监
这个暑假我要去斯里兰卡，等不及了。它离我住的香港很近，我一向想去。食物大约极好吃。它看起来真的很放松，我真的想做康说到巴杜拉的火车旅行，看起来非常棒。咱们现已预定了一个极好的海滩组合，有时在打猎帐子里，期望能在户外看到大象。
我的包，我很可以会采纳Quiksilver 40L包，因为它有内置湿包为我的比基尼。关于在温暖的气候下进行为期一周的旅行来说，这也是一个极好的标准。
Japan---Ben Barras, Creative Director
Japan is definitely my best travel destination recommendation. The culture, the streets, the architecture, the inspiration you get from all of that is amazing. The food is also fascinating.It’s where I’m most planning to go. Tokyo obviously, but also visiting the mountains. You can go snow boarding, which I haven’t done for years.
I have a Vibe 25L Backpack which you can pack a lot in. The thing I like most about it is that it’s compact, but still fits plenty in. I’ll pair that up with a larger travel bag for the rest of my things and use the backpack to get around day to day.
日本——本·巴拉斯(Ben Barras)，构思总监
日本必定是我最佳的旅行意图地举荐。那里的文明、大街、建筑，以及你从中获得的构思都是惊人的。食物也很招引人。这是我最方案去的当地。东京很显着，但也赏识了高山。你可以去玩滑雪板，我现已好几年没玩了。
我有一个Vibe 25L背包，你可以装许多。我最喜爱它的当地是它很细巧，但仍然很合身。我会把它和一个更大的旅行袋放在一同，用来装我的其他东西，然后用这个背包每天四处走动。
Berlin---Phil Hayes, Executive VP of Global Design
For me, it’s definitely Berlin. I’m particularly excited about the fashion, which I hear is pretty full on. Also the art galleries and history. Food, night life. Everything I’ve heard about Berlin is pretty cool, so I’m going to suck as much as I can out of it. World’s Global Style Network had the Berlin shopping list that came out recently, so I’m going to follow that through as well.
Bag wise, it will be the Quiksilver X Collab Bag.It’s the 25L Anti-theft Backpack. It’s normally my go-to bag for city trips because it’s super easy to lock on the plane and in bars, and it’s just the right amount of space.
柏林——菲尔·海斯，全球方案实施副总裁
对我来说，这必定是柏林。我对服装特别感快乐喜爱，我传闻它很盛行。还有美术馆和前史。食物,夜日子。我所听到的关于柏林的悉数都很帅，所以我要尽可以地从中罗致经历。World 's Global Style Network迩来发布了柏林的购物清单，所以我也会持续跟进。
包正确，它将是Quiksilver X协作袋。这是25L的防盗背包。它一般是我在城市旅行时的必备品，因为锁在飞机上和酒吧里都超级简略，而且空间适可而止。
31. Which of thePacsafe bag is a good choice for beach travel?
A. The Quiksilver 40L Pack.
B. The Vibe 25L Backpack.
C. The Quiksilver X Collab Bag.
D. 25L Anti-theftBackpack.
32. If you are interestedin fashion, which destination should you choose?
A. Sri Lanka.
B. Japan.
C. Hong Kong.
D. Berlin.
33. What can you enjoyin all the three places mentioned?
A. Beautiful beaches.
B. Amazing food.
C.Fascinatingart.
D. Coolsnowboarding.
34. The main purpo查找引擎优化f the passage is to ________.
A. share personal travelling experiences
B. offer practical tipson taking adventure
C. present cultures in different countries
D. recommend favorable travel destinations
B
On March 25, 2010, Kate and David heard the words every parent dreads: Their new born wasn’t going to make it.Their twins—a girl and a boy—were born two minutes apart and 14 weeks premature, weighing just over two pounds each. Doctors had tried to save the boy for 20 minutes but saw no improvement. His heartbeat was nearly gone, and he’d stopped breathing. The baby had just moments to live.
“I saw him gasp (喘息), but the doctor said it was nouse,” Kate told theDaily Mailfive years later. “I know it sounds stupid, but if he was still gasping, that was asign of life. I wasn’t going to give up easily.”
Still, the couple knew this waslikely a goodbye. In an effort to cherish her last minutes with the tiny boy,Kate asked to hold him.
“I wanted to meet him, and for him to know us,” Kate toldToday. “We’d resigned ourselves to the fact that we were going to lose him, and we were just trying to make the most of those last, precious moments.”
Kate unwrapped the boy, whom the couple had already named Jamie, from his hospital blanket and asked David to take his shirt off and join them in bed. The first-time parents wanted their son to be as warm as possible and hoped the skin-to-skin contact would improve his condition. They also talked to him.
“We were trying to persuade him to stay,” Kate told theDaily Mail. “We explained his name and that he had a twin that he had to look out for and how hard we had tried to have him.”
Then something miraculous happened. Jamie gasped again—and then he started breathing. Finally, he reached for his father’s finger.
The couple’s lost boy had made it.
“We’re the luckiest people in the world,” David toldToday.
Eight years later, Jamie and his sister, Emily, are happy and healthy. The couple only recently told the kids the story of their birth. “Emily burst into tears,” Kate said. “She was really upset, and she kept hugging Jamie. This whole experience makes you cherish them more.”
2010年3月25日，凯特和大卫听到了每个父母都惧怕听到的话:他们的重生儿活不下去了。他们的双胞胎——一个女孩和一个男孩——出世时相隔两分钟，早产了14周，每自个的体重刚刚跨越两磅。医生们企图抢救这个男孩20分钟，但没有看就任何好转。他的心跳几乎中止，呼吸也中止了。婴儿只需几分钟的时刻可以活了。
五年后，凯特在承受《每日邮报》采访时标明:“我看到他倒抽了一口凉气，但医生说那是鼻屎。”“我晓得这听起来很愚笨，但假定他还在喘气，那就是生命的标志。我不会简略扔掉的。”
不过，这对配偶晓得这可所以离别。为了珍惜和小男孩在一同的最终几分钟，凯特需求抱着他。
“我想见到他，让他晓得咱们，”凯特在承受《今日》采访时标明。“咱们现已承受了这个实际，咱们即将失掉他，咱们只是想充分使用那些最终的宝贵时刻。”
凯特从医院的毯子里把男孩(他们现已给他起了个名字——杰米)翻开，让大卫脱掉衬衣，和他们一同躺在床上。初度做父母的期望他们的儿子尽可以的温暖，并期望这种肌肤触摸能改进他的身体情况。他们也和他攀谈。
凯特在承受《每日邮报》采访时标明:“咱们企图说服他留下来。”“咱们说明了他的名字，他有一个双胞胎兄弟，他有必要照看好他，咱们曾多么尽力地想要具有他。”
然后奇迹发生了。杰米又喘了口气，然后他初步呼吸。最终，他伸手去抓父亲的手指。
这对配偶迷路的儿子成功了。
“咱们是世界上最走运的人，”大卫今日告诉记者。
8年后，杰米和他的小妹艾米丽安康高兴。这对配偶迩来才给孩子们讲了他们出世的故事。“艾米丽哭了，”凯特说。她真的很哀痛，一向抱着杰米。这整个阅历让你愈加珍惜他们。”
35. What can we learn about the newborn babies?
A. The boy’s heart had stopped beating.
B. The boy was 2 minutes older than the girl.
C. The twins were born 14 weeks before the due date.
D. The twins were expected to live for only 20 minutes.
36. When the couple knew they would lose the boy, they ________.
A. begged the doctor to save him
B. took his shirt off and then put him in bed
C. wrapped him with his blanket to keep him warm
D. talked to him and made close physical contact with him
37. What’s the best title for thepassage?
A.The Power of Hug.
B. The Miracle of Love.
C. The Bond Between Twins.
D.The Responsibility of Parents.
C
It’s common knowledge that the woman inLeonardo da Vinci’s most famous painting seems to look back at observers, following them with her eyes no matter where they stand in the room. But this common knowledge turns out wrong.
A new study finds that the woman in the painting is actually looking out at an angle that’s 15.4 degrees off to the observer’s right—well outside of the range that people normally believe when they think someone is looking right at them. In other words, said the study author, Horstmann, “She’s not looking at you.”This is somewhat ironic, because the entire phenomenon of a person’s gaze (凝视)in a photograph or painting seeming to follow the viewer is called the “MonaLisa effect” . That effect is absolutely real, Horstmann said. If a person is illustrated or photographed looking straight ahead, even people viewing the portrait from an angle will feel they are being looked at. As long as the angleof the person’s gaze is no more than about 5 degrees off to either side,theMona Lisa effectoccurs.
This is important for human interaction with on-screen characters. If you want someone off to the right side of a room to feel that a person on-screen is looking at him or her, you don’t cut the gaze of the character to that side—surprisingly, doing 
so would make an observer feel like the character isn’t looking at anyone in the room at all. Instead, you keep the gaze straight ahead.
Horstmann and his co-author were studying this effect for its application in the creation ofartificial-intelligence avatars(虚拟头像)when Horstmann took a long look at the “Mona Lisa” and realized she wasn’t looking at him.
To make sure it wasn’t just him, the researchers asked 24
people to view images of the “Mona Lisa” on a computer screen. They set a ruler between the viewer and the screen and asked the participants to note which number on the ruler intersected Mona Lisa’s gaze. To calculate the angle of Mona Lisa’s gaze as she looked at the viewer, they moved the ruler farther from or closer to the screen during the study. Consistently, the researchers found, participants judged thatthe woman in the “MonaLisa” portrait was not looking straight at them, but slightly off to their right.
So why do people repeat the belief that her eyes seem to follow the viewer? Horstmann isn’t sure. It’s possible, he said,that people have the desire to be looked at, so they think the woman is looking straight at them. Or maybe the people who first coined the term “Mona Lisaeffect” just thought it was a cool name.
众所周知，列奥纳多·达·芬奇(Leonardo da Vinci)最闻名的画作中的女人，不管站在房间的哪个角落，如同都会回头看着调查者，用她的双眼跟从他们。但实际证明，这种常识是差错的。
一项新的研讨发现，这幅画里的女人实践上是在以一个15.4度的视点向外看，这个视点与调查者的右偏——当我们认为有人正盯着他们时，他们一般认为的规模是超出的。换句?担刑肿髡?a href="http://www.yidianzixun.com/m/channel/keyword/霍斯特曼?display=霍斯特曼&word_id=霍斯特曼&type=token">霍斯特曼说，?挥性诳茨恪Ｕ庥械慵シ硪馕叮蛭蛔愿鲈谙嗥蚧婊心拥恼霰硐笕缤歉庸壅叩模獗怀莆?a href="http://www.yidianzixun.com/m/channel/keyword/蒙娜丽莎?display=蒙娜丽莎&word_id=蒙娜丽莎&type=token">蒙娜丽莎效应”。霍斯特曼说，这种影响是必定真实的。假定一自个被画图或被拍摄时直视前方，即就是从一个视点看这幅画像的人也会觉得自个被凝视着。只需这自个的凝视视点不跨越5度支配，就会呈现蒙娜丽莎效应。
这关于人类与屏幕上人物的互动非常重要。假定你想让或人右边的房间觉得屏幕上一自个是看他或她,你不把目光side-surprisingly的人物,这样做会让一个调查者觉得房间里的字符不是看任何人。相反，你把目光直视前方。
霍斯特曼和他的合著者正在研讨这种效应，以便将其使用于人工智能化身的创造。
为了保证不只是是他，研讨人员让24自个在电脑屏幕上观看“蒙娜丽莎”的图像。他们在观众和屏幕之间设置了一把尺子，让参加者留心尺子上的哪个数字与蒙娜丽莎的视野相交。为了核算蒙娜丽莎凝视调查者的视点，他们在研讨进程中把尺子离屏幕更远或更近。研讨人员发现，参加者共同认为，《蒙娜丽莎》画像中的女人并没有直视他们，而是稍稍偏右。
那么，为啥我们老是认为她的双眼会跟着观众走呢?Horstmann并不断定。他说，我们有被凝视的愿望是可以的，所以他们认为女人在直视他们。或许，第一个创造“蒙娜丽莎效应”这个词的人只是觉得这个名字很帅。
38. It is generally believed that the woman in the painting “Mona Lisa”.
A. attracts the viewers to look back
B. seems mysterious because of her eyes
C. fixes her eyes on the back of the viewers
D. looks at the viewers wherever they stand
39. What gaze range in apainting will cause the Mona Lisa effect?
40. The experiment involving 24 people was conducted to______.
A. confirm Horstmann’s belief
B. create artificial-intelligence avatars
C. calculate the angle of Mona Lisa’s gaze
D. explain how the Mona Lisa effect can beapplied
41. What can we learn fromthe passage?
A. Horstmann thinks it’s cool to coin the term “Mona Lisa effect”.
B. The MonaLisa effect contributes to the creation ofartificial intelligence.
C. Feeling being gazed at by Mona Lisa may be caused by the desire for attention.
D. The positionof the ruler in the experiment will influence the viewers’ judgement.
D
What a Messy Desk Says About You
For some time, psychologists have been studying how personality traits affect health and health-related choices. Not surprisingly, they have found that people blessed with innate conscientiousness, meaning that they are organized and predictable, typically eat better and live longer than people who are disorderly.They also tend to haveimmaculateoffices.
What has been less clear is whether neat environments can produce good habits even in those who aren’t necessarily innately conscientious. To find out, researchers at the University of Minnesota conducted a series of experiments. In the first experiment, they randomly assigned a group of college-age students to spend time intwooffice spaces, one of which was very neat, the other wildly cluttered (乱堆) with papers and other work-relatedstuff. The students spent their time filling out questionnaires unrelated to thestudy. After 10 minutes, they were told they could leave with an apple or a chocolate bar. Those students who sat in the orderly office were twice as likely to choose the apple as those who sat among the mess.
A second experiment, however, found that working in chaos has its advantages, too. In this one, college students were placed in a messy or a neat office and asked to dream up new uses for Ping-Pong balls. Those in messy spacesgeneratedideas that were significantly more creative, according to two independent judges, than those in offices where stacks of papers and other objects were neatlyarranged.
The results were something of a surprise, says Dr. Vohs, the leader of the study. Few previous studies found much virtue in disorder. The broken window theory, proposed decades ago,holdsthat even slight disorder and neglect can encourage in difference and poor discipline.
But in the study byDr. Vohs, disordered offices encouraged originality and a search for novelty. In the final portion of the study, adults were given the choice of adding a health “boost” to their lunchtime smoothie that was labeled either “new” or“classic.” The volunteers in the messy space were far more likely to choose the new one; those in the tidy office generally chose the classic version.
“Disorderly environments seem to inspire breaking free of tradition,” Dr. Vohs and her co-authors conclude in the study,“which can produce fresh insights.”
The implications of these findings are also practical. “My advice would be, if you need tothink outside the boxfor a future project”, Dr. Vohssays, “then let the clutter rise and free your imagination. But if your primary goal is to eat well or to go to the gym, pick up around your office first. By doing this, the naturally messy can acquire some of the discipline of the conscientious.”
凌乱的作业桌阐明你是个啥样的人
一段时刻以来，心思学家一向在研讨品质特征如何影响安康和与安康有关的选择。公然如此，他们发现，天然生成有自觉性的人，也就是有条理、可猜测的人，一般比那些不守规则的人吃得非常好，活得更久。他们的单位一般也很规整。
不太理解的是，规整的环境是不是能培育出杰出的习气，即就是那些不必定天然生成就有责任心的人。为了找到答案，明尼苏达大学的研讨人员进行了一系列实验。在第一个实验中，他们随机组织一组大学生在两个单位里呆上一段时刻，其间一个非常规整，另一个则堆满了文件和其他与作业有关的东西。学生们花时刻填写与研讨无关的问卷。10分钟后，他们被奉告可以带一个苹果或一块巧克力脱离。坐在规整单位里的学生选择苹果的可以性是坐在乱糟糟的单位里的学生的两倍。
可是，第二个实验发现，在混沌中作业也有其优势。在这个实验中，大学生们被组织在一个凌乱或规整的单位里，需求他们想出乒乓球的新用处。根据两位独立评委的说法，那些在凌乱空间里的人发生的构思显着比那些在单位里堆积着文件和其他物品的人更具创造性。
这项研讨的担任人沃斯博士说，研讨成果有些出其不料。早年很稀有研讨发现无序中有许多优点。几十年条件出的破窗理论认为，即就是纤细的紊乱和无视，也会鼓舞差异和纪律不良。
可是在dr。凌乱的单位鼓舞立异和对别致事物的探究。在研讨的最终一有些中，成年人被需求在午饭奶昔中添加一种安康“强身健体”的成分，这种成分要么标示为“新”，要么标示为“经典”。“在凌乱空间里的自愿者更有可以选择新的;那些在规整的单位里的人一般选择经典的版别。
“无序的环境如同激起了我们打破传统，”沃斯博士和她的合著者在研讨中总结道，“这可以发生新的见地。”
这些发现的意义也很实践。沃斯博士说:“我的主张是，假定你需要在将来的项目中跳出框框思考，那么就让凌乱的东西升起来，开释你的愿望力。”但假定你的首要方针是吃得好或去健身房，那就先在单位里拾掇一下。经过这样做，天然生成龌龊的人可以获得一些自觉的纪律。”
42. The underlined word “immaculate”inparagraph 1 probably means ______.
A. messy
B. tidy
C.terrible
D. comfortable
43. Which ofthe following can best explain the broken window theory?
A. Chaos begets chaos.
B. Misfortunemay be an actual blessing.
C. Bad news has wings.
D.When a door shuts, a window opens.
44. Which ofthe following will Dr. Vohs probably agree with?
A. More virtue exists in organized people.
B. Creativity results from tidiness anddiscipline.
C. Disorderly surroundings help to create newideas.
D. Workers’ good habits guarantee the successof a project.
45.What can we conclude from the study results?
1. The naturallyneat people tend to be very creative.
2. A messy officewill cause quite low working efficiency.
3. Environments canaffect people’s way of thinking and behavior.
4. People’spersonalities are determined by their working environments.
参阅答案：第二有些：阅览了解（共两节，40分）第一节（共15小题；每小题2分，共30分）
31. A 32. D 33. B 34. D 35. C
36. D 37. B 38. D 39. B 40. A
41. C 42. B 43. A 44. C 45. C
